![]() At NATO’s Warsaw Summit, alliance leaders declared that they would “further strengthen maritime posture and comprehensive situational awareness” and “operationalize” the 2011 Alliance Maritime Strategy. Fortunately, this will not require massive investments, new strategies, or significant military reposturing.įirst, it must bring the GIUK gap back into the fold of its defense planning, this time with a focus on the GIUK gap–Norway axis as the warming Arctic opens new avenues for military activities. The alliance must now take steps to rebuild and recover its hold on the GIUK gap. With a strong enough force in the North Atlantic, Russia could, in effect, cut off North America from Europe…. Through long-range anti-ship and anti-air systems onboard submarines, Russia can create zones in the North Atlantic where NATO planes and ships cannot operate without fear of being shot down or sunk. ![]() Russia has also begun bolstering its anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities in the North Atlantic through its submarine capabilities. However, it must acknowledge that the North Atlantic could be the next focal point for Russian military aggression…. NATO does not need to think of the GIUK gap in terms of Cold War-style conventional warfare. It remains the gateway to the Atlantic Ocean for Russia’s largest and most strategically important fleet, the Northern Fleet. ![]() The GIUK gap is still the only point through which Russia can project power into the Atlantic Ocean and Europe’s littoral beyond the bottlenecked Baltic and Black Seas. S Russia ramps up its military presence in the North Atlantic, NATO’s presence has atrophied.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |